turkmath.org

This is the continuation of last week's talk. The abstract of last week is included below: This is a joint project with I. Itenberg and S. Sertöz. I will discuss the recent developments in our never ending saga on lines in nonsingular projective quartic surfaces. In 1943, B. Segre proved that such a surface cannot contain more than 64 lines. (The champion, so-called Schur's quartic, has been known since 1882.) Even though a gap was discovered in Segre's proof (Rams, Schütt), the claim is still correct; moreover, it holds over any field of characteristic other than 2 or 3. (In characteristic 3, the right bound seems to be 112.) At the same time, it was conjectured by some people that not any number between 0 and 64 can occur as the number of lines in a quartic. We tried to attack the problem using the theory of K3-surfaces and arithmetic of lattices. Alas, a relatively simple reduction has lead us to an extremely difficult arithmetical problem. Nevertheless, the approach turned out quite fruitful: for the moment, we can show that there are but three quartics with more than 56 lines, the number of lines being 64 (Schur's quartic) or 60 (two others). Furthermore, we can prove that a real quartic cannot contain more than 56 real lines, and we have an example realizing this bound. We can also construct quartics with any number of lines in {0; : : : ; 52; 54; 56; 60; 64}, thus leaving only two values open. Conjecturally, we have a list of all quartics with more than 48 lines. (The threshold 48 is important in view of another theorem by Segre, concerning planar sections.) There are about two dozens of species, all but one 1-parameter family being projectively rigid.